Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Wolf-Ulrich and Chris,

Please see the attached revised letters.  In the GAC version I have deleted
the last question and also tried to revised the cost-burden question
according to Wolf-Ulrich's suggestion below.  In addition, I have
incorporated Jim's changes.

Best regards,
Julie

From:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Friday, January 31, 2014 7:11 AM
To:  "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>, Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input
Letters

Right. I think it might be more helpful at the beginning to ask for ideas re
basic principles to be agreed to guide the cost burden discussion, eg free
of charge provision of the information, demand oriented cost etc.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
From: Dillon, Chris <mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:35 PM
To: WUKnoben <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>  ; Julie Hedlund
<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>  ; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input
Letters
 
Dear Wolf-Ulrich,
 
Thank you for more good points.
 
It sounds as if there may be a case for leaving out the last question in the
GAC letter, but it would be good to tell them that we are tasked with the
³who should bear the burden² issue.
 
Regards,
 
Chris.

--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities,
UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon
 

From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: 31 January 2014 09:40
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input
Letters
 

Dear Julie,

 

I¹m fine with the letter in general but I¹m not sure whether the last 2
questions are suitable to GAC members ­ as long as we don¹t provide
alternative answers (eg registrars, registries, operators...). In particular
the very last question seems to be directed to SGs/Cs only.

 

Please don¹t understand this as an objection rather than a question.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:36 PM

To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx

Subject: FW: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input
Letters

 

Dear PDP WG members,

 

I have not seen any comments, questions, or changes with respect to the
attached letters.  If there are no objections we will send out the letters
by the end of this week.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:30 AM
To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

 

Dear all,

Having consulted with our Senior Director for GAC relations, Olof Nordling,
I have slightly extended the letter based on his input. In addition, please
also find attached a letter that you might want to send out to individual
GAC members; you can find the list of current GAC here Representatives -
https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives. As you see
email addresses are provided for both so we could send the letter to those
members you might think are most useful.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Lars

 

 

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 PM
To: "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

 

Dear PDP WG members,

 

Per the action items from today's meeting attached are two letters.  One is
for the GAC and one is for the other SOs and ACs.  These also are posted to
the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/23+January+2014
under "For Review."  The action is to finalize these letters so that they
can be sent by Friday, 31 January.  Please send any comments, questions, or
changes to this list by COB Tuesday, 28 January.  Staff will compile the
changes and send revised versions for approval by 30 January on the list.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Attachment: GACinput_final-v2.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: individual GAC Letter_v3.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: Request for Input to SO-AC 23 January 2014.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature