Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

["Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Julie,

Thank you for your drafting, especially of the burden part. As far as I can see 
the letters are now ready to go.

Thank you also for amending the agenda. Perhaps we'll have time to OK changes 
to the questions and definitions we discuss on the list before Thursday.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, 31 January 2014 14:57
To: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, Chris 
Dillon <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Wolf-Ulrich and Chris,

Please see the attached revised letters.  In the GAC version I have deleted the 
last question and also tried to revised the cost-burden question according to 
Wolf-Ulrich's suggestion below.  In addition, I have incorporated Jim's changes.

Best regards,
Julie

From: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, January 31, 2014 7:11 AM
To: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>>, Julie 
Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Right. I think it might be more helpful at the beginning to ask for ideas re 
basic principles to be agreed to guide the cost burden discussion, eg free of 
charge provision of the information, demand oriented cost etc.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Dillon, Chris<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:35 PM
To: WUKnoben<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> ; Julie 
Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> ; 
gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

Thank you for more good points.

It sounds as if there may be a case for leaving out the last question in the 
GAC letter, but it would be good to tell them that we are tasked with the “who 
should bear the burden” issue.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

From:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
Sent: 31 January 2014 09:40
To: Julie Hedlund; 
gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear Julie,

I’m fine with the letter in general but I’m not sure whether the last 2 
questions are suitable to GAC members – as long as we don’t provide alternative 
answers (eg registrars, registries, operators...). In particular the very last 
question seems to be directed to SGs/Cs only.

Please don’t understand this as an objection rather than a question.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Julie Hedlund<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:36 PM
To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: FW: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear PDP WG members,

I have not seen any comments, questions, or changes with respect to the 
attached letters.  If there are no objections we will send out the letters by 
the end of this week.

Best regards,

Julie

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Friday, January 24, 2014 10:30 AM
To: 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear all,
Having consulted with our Senior Director for GAC relations, Olof Nordling, I 
have slightly extended the letter based on his input. In addition, please also 
find attached a letter that you might want to send out to individual GAC 
members; you can find the list of current GAC here Representatives - 
https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives. As you see email 
addresses are provided for both so we could send the letter to those members 
you might think are most useful.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars


From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:32 PM
To: 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Please Comment: Request for Input Letters

Dear PDP WG members,

Per the action items from today's meeting attached are two letters.  One is for 
the GAC and one is for the other SOs and ACs.  These also are posted to the 
wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/23+January+2014 under "For 
Review."  The action is to finalize these letters so that they can be sent by 
Friday, 31 January.  Please send any comments, questions, or changes to this 
list by COB Tuesday, 28 January.  Staff will compile the changes and send 
revised versions for approval by 30 January on the list.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director