ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Re: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday 30 October 2014 / some further comments/questions, etc

  • To: "Emily Taylor" <emily.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Re: Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Thursday 30 October 2014 / some further comments/questions, etc
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:40:46 GMT

Thanks, Emily.<div><br /></div><div>I'll have a meeting within 20 min from now 
to further discuss this topic (at INTA).</div><div><br 
/></div><div>Best,</div><div>Petter<br /><br />-- <br />Petter Rindforth, LL M
<br />
<br />Fenix Legal KB
<br />Stureplan 4c, 4tr
<br />114 35 Stockholm
<br />Sweden
<br />Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
<br />Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
<br />E-mail: petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<br />www.fenixlegal.eu
<br />
<br />
<br />NOTICE
<br />This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals 
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any 
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by 
return e-mail.
<br />Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu
<br />Thank you<br /><br /><p>11 november 2014, Emily Taylor 
&lt;emily.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt; skrev:</p><blockquote type="cite"><div 
class="oneComWebmail-html oneComWebmail-mail"><div 
class="oneComWebmail-body"><div dir="ltr">Dear Petter<div><br />Thank you for 
your message, and apologies for the delay in responding to your 
points.</div><div><br /></div><div><p class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><font 
face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color="#000000">I wanted to address the 
claim that because contracted parties had not made noises about ICANN’s 
advisory they must be okay with it. </font><span style="color: rgb(0,0,0); 
font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">I’ve attached a letter that I'm 
informed was provided by the RySG to ICANN staff as a result of the RySG being 
provided an early version of the advisor for comment. I understand that none of 
these comments were taken into account by ICANN when they published the 
advisory and despite being asked why, I don’t believe any answer was 
forthcoming.</span></p><p class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><span style="color: 
rgb(0,0,0); font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p 
class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(0,0,0); font-family: 
arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">In short, there have been expressions of concern 
over the recent advisory, and my understanding from discussions on the RrSG 
list is that many have concerns over transliteration and translation of WHOIS 
data.</span></p><p class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><span style="color: 
rgb(31,73,125); font-size: 11pt;"><br /></span></p><p 
class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, 
sans-serif">Kind regards</font></p><p class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><span 
style="color: rgb(31,73,125); font-size: 11pt;"><br /></span></p><p 
class="oneComWebmail-MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" face="arial, helvetica, 
sans-serif">Emily</font><span style="color: rgb(31,73,125); font-size: 
11pt;"> </span></p></div><div class="oneComWebmail-gmail_extra"><br /><div 
class="oneComWebmail-gmail_quote">On 30 October 2014 13:20, Petter Rindforth 
<span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
target="_blank">petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br 
/><blockquote class="oneComWebmail-gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 
0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204,204,204); 
border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex;"><br /><blockquote><div><div>Dear 
All,<div><br /></div><div>Just a last minute summary of <br /><div><b><span 
lang="EN-US">Some further 
comments/questions/inputs/suggestions:</span></b></div><div><b><span 
lang="EN-US"><br /></span></b></div><div><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><span 
style="line-height: 15.3333320617676px;">(collected from the IP point of 
view)</span></font></div><div><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><span 
style="line-height: 15.3333320617676px;"><br 
/></span></font></div><div><b><span lang="EN-US"><br /></span></b></div><div>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">Note that<span> </span>ICANN
issued an advisory last month clarifying technical aspects of provisions of the
2013 RAA and new gTLD Registry Agreement regarding uniform requirements for
presenting Whois data.   </span><span><a 
href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registry-agreement-spec4-raa-rdds-2014-09-12-en";
 target="_blank"><span style="color: 
windowtext;">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registry-agreement-spec4-raa-rdds-2014-09-12-en</span></a><span> </span>. 
 </span><span lang="EN-US">Significantly , it states that  “<b><i>Registries 
and Registrars are
encouraged to only use  US-ASCII encoding and character repertoire for
WHOIS port 43 output</i></b>.”  The purpose is to facilitate parsing of
Whois data by automated tools such as ICANN’s centralized Whois data 
portal,<span> </span></span><span><a href="http://whois.icann.org/"; 
target="_blank"><span lang="EN-US" style="color: 
windowtext;">http://whois.icann.org/</span></a></span><span><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US">.  Similar arguments would apply 
to facilitating
machine translation.  </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">Thus the status quo is (or will be, by February 2015)
that contracted parties are at least “encouraged” to transliterate into ASCII
if Whois data is submitted in some other script.  </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">Has anyone heard any howls of outrage from registries
and registrars over this?  </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">The advisory also states”<span> </span></span><span lang="EN">All 
domain name
labels in the values of any of the fields described in section 1.4.2 of the
2013 RAA, and sections 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7 of Specification 4 of the Registry
Agreement (e.g., Domain Name, Name Server, email) MUST be shown in
ASCII-compatible form (A-Label).</span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; background: white;"><span lang="EN">For 
example, a name server with an IDN label should be
shown as:</span><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt 30pt; background: white;"><i><span 
lang="EN">Name Server: ns1.xn--caf-dma.example.”</span></i></p>

<p style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 
30.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; background: white;"><span lang="EN-US">The 
referenced fields include virtually all the
registrant data we are concerned with.  See the listing in section 1.4.2
of Specification 3 of the 2013 RAA,<span> </span></span><span><a 
href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en"; 
target="_blank"><span lang="EN-US" style="color: 
windowtext;">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en</span></a></span><span><span
 lang="EN-US"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US">.</span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">I’m not certain whether this ASCII requirement applies
only to the labels (e.g., “Name Server”) or to the content following the label
--- the example given suggests the latter—which further solidifies the idea
that contracted parties are already required to transliterate Whois data into
ASCII.  But I could be misreading this requirement.   </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">§§§</span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">·        <span> "</span>I think it would be useful to suggest
the requirement that all Whois text be machine-readable text. I’m not sure if
that’s already a recommendation of the EWG report, but as one can imagine, the
Whois systems that substitute graphics for the e-mail (which, for all we know,
could spread to other fields) would stymie attempts at automated translation by
users of Whois.</span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US">·        <span> </span>Does anyone have any ideas for
avoiding flight by bad actors to the least translatable languages? One idea
would be to require:</span></p>

<p style="margin: 0cm; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 
72.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size: 10.0pt;">·<span style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; 
font-family: 'Times New Roman';">       
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Whois info to be in
either the language of the registrar or registrant (i.e. can’t pick some random
language just to make it hard to 
translate),<span> </span><i><u>and</u></i></span></p>

<p style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 
72.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span 
lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

<p style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-left: 
72.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; background: white;"><span lang="EN-US" 
style="font-size: 10.0pt;">·<span style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 7pt; 
font-family: 'Times New Roman';">       
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">translation or
transliteration is required if it’s not in a) Latin characters, b) one of the
six U.N. languages, or c) possibly some larger but reasonable set of well-known
and widely translatable languages (say, 20 or so)."</span></p><br />-- <br 
/>Petter Rindforth, LL M
<br />
<br />Fenix Legal KB
<br />Stureplan 4c, 4tr
<br />114 35 Stockholm
<br />Sweden
<br />Fax: <a href="tel:%2B46%280%298-4631010" 
target="_blank">+46(0)8-4631010</a>
<br />Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
<br />E-mail: <a href="mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
target="_blank">petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>
<br /><a href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu"; target="_blank">www.fenixlegal.eu</a>
<br />
<br />
<br />NOTICE
<br />This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals 
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any 
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by 
return e-mail.
<br />Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <a href="http://www.fenixlegal.eu"; 
target="_blank">www.fenixlegal.eu</a>
<br />Thank you<br /><br 
/></div></div></div></div></blockquote></blockquote></div><div><br /></div>-- 
<br /><div class="oneComWebmail-gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div 
dir="ltr"><p style="font-size: small; font-family: arial; color: rgb(0,0,0); 
font-weight: bold; margin: 0px;"><font face="arial, helvetica, 
sans-serif">Emily Taylor</font></p><p style="font-size: small; font-family: 
arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;"><font face="arial, helvetica, 
sans-serif"><i style="color: rgb(0,0,0);">MA(Cantab), MBA</i><br /><font 
color="#38761d">Director</font></font></p><p style="font-size: small; 
margin-bottom: 60px;"><font face="arial, helvetica, 
sans-serif"><strong>Netistrar Ltd </strong>- Domain Names at Trade Prices<br 
/><font color="#38761d" style="font-family: arial;">W: <a 
href="http://www.netistrar.com/"; style="color: rgb(17,85,204);" 
target="_blank">http://www.netistrar.com</a></font><font color="#000000" 
style="font-family: arial;"> </font><font color="#38761d" style="font-family: 
arial;">| M</font><font color="#38761d" style="font-family: 
arial;">: </font><font color="#000000"><font face="arial">07540 049322 <font 
color="#38761d">| T:</font><font color="#000000"> 01283 617808 </font><br /><br 
/></font></font></font><font color="#1155cc"><img width="200" height="50" 
data-src="http://www.netistrar.com/wp-content/themes/carfax-child/assets/img/Netistrar_Domain_Name_Registrar.gif";
 style="" /><br /></font><span style="color: rgb(170,170,170);"><br />Repton 
House, Bretby Business Park, Bretby, Derbyshire, DE15 0YZ<br />Registered in 
England and Wales No. 08735583. VAT No. 190062332</span><br 
/></p></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>
<span id="externalImagesFiltered"></span></div></div></blockquote></div>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy