ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Summary of Thursday's call, comment review tool for response by 24:00 UTC Weds. 15 and first draft of final report

  • To: "Dillon, Chris" <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Summary of Thursday's call, comment review tool for response by 24:00 UTC Weds. 15 and first draft of final report
  • From: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:26:36 +0000

Dear colleagues,

I’ve added my comments to the public comment tool, attached.

Best,

Sara

From: <Dillon>, Chris <c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:c.dillon@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, April 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM
To: 
"gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] Summary of Thursday's call, comment review 
tool for response by 24:00 UTC Weds. 15 and first draft of final report

Dear colleagues,

I am sending a summary of Thursday 9th's call so that decisions we made are in 
one place and easily available to those unable to attend.

We discussed the public comment review tool for one of the last times. Please 
find a new version of it attached to this email. Note especially lines 22, 74 
and 75 and various other additions as a result of Justine’s and Pascal’s 
suggestions. There are new columns asking whether you agree with the comments 
and responses.
Please fill this in and return to the mailing list by 24:00 UTC on Wednesday 15 
April. This will help us locate areas of difference in the group.

We also discussed the work plan:
Four meetings (16, 23 and 30 April and 7 May) and submit on May 11
Or, if this does not work for some reason, add meetings on 14, 21 and 28 May, 
and 4 and 11 June and submit on June 14.

This discussion included some ideas for the final report, which is attached to 
this email:
- The final version is based on the initial version and include the final 
version of the comment review tool and a link to the final version of the 
initial report. Early versions of the final report will indicate non-formatting 
changes.
- Pink in the draft means "unfinished - we need to discuss it".
One example of its use is on language interfaces for the Whois replacement. 
Currently we have that the interfaces should be "in as many languages as 
possible" but we know there are legal issues with this wording. If you know how 
to fix pink areas, please send text.
I've also used Pink on the initial draft of the other recommendations that the 
report includes. Possibly they should be in a separate document as much work 
needs to be done, but including a broken draft of them may save a little time.

Incidentally there was a detailed discussion of the necessity to identify 
language and script of data, possibly by tagging. This is another area which is 
likely to require further work.

Regards,

Chris.
--
Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, 
Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) 
www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon>

Attachment: bineHGGBGi8yz.bin
Description: application/applefile

Attachment: Public comment review tool TT Initial Report V8.2 - SB.doc
Description: Public comment review tool TT Initial Report V8.2 - SB.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy