ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-contro-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-contro-wg] Thread 1: disputes brought by non ICANN entities

  • To: Controversial TLDs <gnso-contro-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-contro-wg] Thread 1: disputes brought by non ICANN entities
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:44:29 -0400



1. Propose creating a category called Controversial
Names for use at the top level only. A label that
is applied for would be considered Controversial
if during the Public Comment phase of the new
gTLD application process the label becomes
disputed by a formal notice of a consensus
position from an ICANN Advisory Committee or
ICANN Supporting Organization, and otherwise
meets the definition of Controversial Names as
defined above.

1. Is a dispute by a non ICANN body allowed? If so, are there any constraints involved? Is the process the same as for an ICANN AC?






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy