[gnso-contro-wg] Controversial Names Subgroup report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I have attached rev 06 of the Controversial Names report.  While I  
have done my best to try and capture the 'strong support' point of  
the sub-group, some comments came in at the end that were merged into  
the document without sub-group discussion.

The two primary recommendations that came in late were:

- a basic reorganization of the dispute resolution process for  
clarity with some content editing for achieving majority support.

- the addition of a requirement that

> Any consensus or other formally supported position from an ICANN  
> Advisory Committee or ICANN Supporting Organization must document  
> the position of each member within that committee or organization  
> (i.e., support, opposition, abstention) in compliance with both the  
> spirit and letter of the ICANN bylaws regarding openness and  
> transparency.

It is possible that sub-group members may want to add minority  
statements with regard to these changes if I have incorrectly  
perceived the level of support.

thanks.

a.

Attachment: RN-WG
Description: Binary data