From: "vmcevedy" <vmcevedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 8 maj 2007 15.55.32 EDT
To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-contro-wg] final draft 05
A --attached is a redline with my comments. I guess you might want
to circulate to sub group before doing anything with it. Sorry its
extensive. Ill wait for majority before submitting minority.
cheers. v
----- Original Message ----- From: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: "Controversial TLDs" <gnso-contro-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:27 PM
Subject: [gnso-contro-wg] final draft 05
Hi,
an inconsistency was pointed out to me. I had not modified the table
to take into account the decision concerning consensus decisions in
the Advisory committee.
Recommendation 1 should read:
1. Propose creating a category called Controversial
Names for use at the top level only. A label that
is applied for would be considered Controversial
if during the Public Comment phase of the new
gTLD application process the label becomes
disputed by a formal notice of a consensus
position or other formally supported decision process
from an ICANN Advisory Committee or
ICANN Supporting Organization, and otherwise
meets the definition of Controversial Names as
defined above.
I have attached the updated draft.
a.