[gnso-contro-wg] final draft 05
an inconsistency was pointed out to me. I had not modified the table to take into account the decision concerning consensus decisions in the Advisory committee.
Recommendation 1 should read:
1. Propose creating a category called Controversial Names for use at the top level only. A label that is applied for would be considered Controversial if during the Public Comment phase of the new gTLD application process the label becomes disputed by a formal notice of a consensus position or other formally supported decision process from an ICANN Advisory Committee or ICANN Supporting Organization, and otherwise meets the definition of Controversial Names as defined above.