[gnso-contro-wg] final draft 05

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

an inconsistency was pointed out to me.  I had not modified the table  
to take into account the decision concerning consensus decisions in  
the Advisory committee.

Recommendation 1  should read:

> 1. Propose creating a category called Controversial
> Names for use at the top level only. A label that
> is applied for would be considered Controversial
> if during the Public Comment phase of the new
> gTLD application process the label becomes
> disputed by a formal notice of a consensus
> position or other formally supported decision process
> from an ICANN Advisory Committee or
> ICANN Supporting Organization, and otherwise
> meets the definition of Controversial Names as
> defined above.

I have attached the updated draft.

a.

Attachment: RN-WG
Description: Binary data