[gnso-contro-wg] Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Controversial Names Subgroup report
hi, Thank you for normalizing the look and feel of the report. Re the issue of removing the old recommendations. For the most part, the content is included in the new recommendations. I am not sure, however, that _all_ of the aspects are covered, and thus we may need to retain the original proposals or we may need to add the content into the current recommendation set. The subgroup did, however, pretty much use those recommendations, having been supported originally but requiring more work, as the agreed upon base for the new recommendations. Where we did make changes, e.g. the move away from requiring full consensus decisions from the ACs, those were explicit decisions and were discussed in the background section of the document a. On 9 maj 2007, at 08.57, Gomes, Chuck wrote: <Subgroup Report for Controversial Names with Gomes edits 8 May.doc> |