[gnso-contro-wg] Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Controversial Names Subgroup report
I am going out for several hours now, but can look at it when i get back. I take you have decided that it is better to weave those recommendations back in as opposed to just leaving them in.
As for the 2nd and 3rd level that was decided the last time, and as far as i know not even in the SOW for this time. As I remember there was a recommendation then that there were no CN considerations being recommend for 2nd level and beyond.
On 9 maj 2007, at 10.39, Gomes, Chuck wrote: