Re: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Start to work?

[Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>]

Alan,

Thanks for the link and checking with Denise.

Your search terms must have been better than mine, but figuring the
correct ones on the ICANN site can be entertaining. As I think was
mentioned on the WG list, .cat also used the RSEP process.
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm.

Don

On 2/6/13 11:31 AM, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Regarding use of the procedure,
>http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/Week-of-Mon-20110815/001212.html
>says that the procedure was used once by a registry. However,
>http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/rsep?page=4 seems to
>clearly indicate that they also used the RSEP process, and that this
>process was completed prior to the 17Jan08 effective date of the policy.
>
>I have written to Denise asking for a clarification.
>
> From my personal point of view, being associated with the ALAC which
>considers such issues of great importance, I cannot recall an
>invocation of the policy.
>
>Alan
>
>At 06/02/2013 10:27 AM, Don Blumenthal wrote:
>
>>Hello.
>>
>>First, for  subteam members who weren't on the call yesterday, we
>>decided to move the privacy and data protection group's priority up
>>because of the discussions since last week. The conversation also
>>took up a significant part of the weekly meeting. I volunteered to
>>get the process going.
>>
>>I really don't know how much work we have to do. The first step will
>>be to focus the issues. A lot have been kicked around but many of
>>them won't be relevant. In addition, it may be that some or all of
>>the questions have relatively simple answers.
>>
>>Some thoughts and questions to start:
>>
>>I'd like to set a call up. I'll be in all-day meetings at PIR
>>offices on Monday and Tuesday and traveling on Thursday, so I'll
>>work with Marika to set a poll up for the rest of this week and
>>Wednesday and Friday of the next one. I'll also ask about a phone
>>bridge, although we may have more flexibility with Skype. Does
>>everyone have an account? I also can use it to call US landlines
>>without any charges.
>>
>>I still haven't received a response from the person I know in the
>>GC's office about whether the ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS
>>Conflicts with Privacy Law,
>>http://www.icann.org/en/processes/icann-procedure-17jan08.htm, ever
>>has been invoked. Does anybody know or have a source we can ask who
>>will answer the question?
>>
>>We have had some good comments and questions from WG members who
>>aren't part of this group. I want to make sure we keep others in the
>>loop on what we're doing, maybe with periodic reports and requests
>>for thoughts.
>>
>>We'll want to figure a way to get contributions from the group of
>>experts who were part of the VRSN-PIR thin-thick transition.
>>
>>I think that covers it. Please feel free to post on this list about
>>what questions we should cover, thoughts on the general list and
>>call discussions, if you have specific issue areas that we can draw
>>on, and whatever else seems appropriate.
>>
>>Don
>>
>>=========================
>>DON M. BLUMENTHAL, Esq.
>>Senior Policy Advisor
>>.ORG, The Public Interest Registry
>>Direct: +1 734 418-8242  | Mobile: +1 202 431-0874 | Skype:
>>donblumenthal |
>>
>>Find us on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pir.org>  |  .ORG
>>Blog<http://blog.pir.org/> | Flickr<http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> |
>>YouTube<http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> |
>>Twitter<http://twitter.com/ORGBuzz> |
>