[gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] RE: Initial documents for tomorrow's session

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

Don, thank you for compiling these documents in one convenient package.  

The third document (NCUC annex) refers in several places to attachments (see, 
e.g., pp 2 (issue #4) and 3 (issue #6)).  May we assume that these attachments 
refer to the other 3 documents you distributed on February 20 per Roy's request 
(see attached)?  

Speak with you in a couple of hours.  

Steve Metalitz 



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don 
Blumenthal
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:07 PM
To: gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Initial documents for tomorrow's 
session

It seems that my world is "all new gTLD issues, all the time" these days. I did 
manage to carve some privacy time out.

I have attached a few documents, some of which, for convenience, are repeats 
from other messages. The first is the synopsis that I promised. It't not the 
document that went into the ozone because I decided that I had thrown too many 
opinions into it. You will hear them, but the document wasn't the right place. 
Please let me know if you think I missed some major items and, maybe more 
important, if I mischaracterized organizations' positions or missed a commenter 
in my lists under individual items.

No summary does complete justice to submitted documents. The other attachments 
provide more information and some thoughts for issues to keep in mind. I had 
intended to put my synopsis in the grid but now think that it's more 
appropriate to do that after our discussion.

1) My identification of major issues raised by comments and list of which 
commenters fit under each one.
2) Data protection comments from the larger staff summary of all comments.
3) The additional NCUC submission to the subteam.
4) The staff grid of some issues to consider in the context of commenters' 
points.

That's it for tonight. I will send some additional thoughts tomorrow before the 
call.

Don

--- Begin Message ---

• To: "gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] FW: Whois 10 issues identified: annex statement
• From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:16:18 +0000

Let's hope it works from my account.

Don

From: <Balleste>, Roy <rballeste@xxxxxxx<mailto:rballeste@xxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:28 AM
To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx<mailto:dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>>
Subject: FW: Whois 10 issues identified: annex statement

Don,

Hope you don't mind.  Our email is having issues today.  I am sending the 
information to you directly.
I will be present today for the meeting.

Thank you!

Roy


From: Balleste, Roy
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:22 AM
To: 
gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Whois 10 issues identified: annex statement
Importance: High

Don and sub-group members,

This annex to the NCUC questionnaire comments on privacy and data protection is 
submitted as an NCUC-endorsed statement with additional information.

Roy



Roy Balleste, J.S.D.
Law Library Director
Professor of Law
St. Thomas University
16401 NW 37th Avenue
Miami Gardens, FL 33054  USA
1-305-623-2341

Attachment: schaar-to-cerf-12mar07-en.pdf
Description: schaar-to-cerf-12mar07-en.pdf

Attachment: 20120926_letter_to_icann_en emphasized.pdf
Description: 20120926_letter_to_icann_en emphasized.pdf

Attachment: safe_harbor_fact_or_fiction.pdf
Description: safe_harbor_fact_or_fiction.pdf

Attachment: data.protection.privacy.statement.2013.docx
Description: data.protection.privacy.statement.2013.docx

--- End Message ---