[gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Re: Initial documents for tomorrow's session

[Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>]

Steve,

Thanks for covering for my brain cramp yesterday. I noted the attachment
references but forgot to go back and identify the documents.

The references are to documents that Roy asked me to send. The Safe Harbor
reference explains itself in the file name. I think that the letters go
together with respect to the OPOC issue.

Don

On 3/6/13 1:49 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>Don, thank you for compiling these documents in one convenient package.
>
>The third document (NCUC annex) refers in several places to attachments
>(see, e.g., pp 2 (issue #4) and 3 (issue #6)).  May we assume that these
>attachments refer to the other 3 documents you distributed on February 20
>per Roy's request (see attached)?
>
>Speak with you in a couple of hours.
>
>Steve Metalitz 
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don
>Blumenthal
>Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:07 PM
>To: gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-dataprotection-thickwhois] Initial documents for
>tomorrow's session
>
>It seems that my world is "all new gTLD issues, all the time" these days.
>I did manage to carve some privacy time out.
>
>I have attached a few documents, some of which, for convenience, are
>repeats from other messages. The first is the synopsis that I promised.
>It't not the document that went into the ozone because I decided that I
>had thrown too many opinions into it. You will hear them, but the
>document wasn't the right place. Please let me know if you think I missed
>some major items and, maybe more important, if I mischaracterized
>organizations' positions or missed a commenter in my lists under
>individual items.
>
>No summary does complete justice to submitted documents. The other
>attachments provide more information and some thoughts for issues to keep
>in mind. I had intended to put my synopsis in the grid but now think that
>it's more appropriate to do that after our discussion.
>
>1) My identification of major issues raised by comments and list of which
>commenters fit under each one.
>2) Data protection comments from the larger staff summary of all comments.
>3) The additional NCUC submission to the subteam.
>4) The staff grid of some issues to consider in the context of
>commenters' points.
>
>That's it for tonight. I will send some additional thoughts tomorrow
>before the call.
>
>Don
>
>