RE: [gnso-dow123] Draft questions

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ok.  I do not want to start a debate on this subject, I was just recounting a 
question that came up during our call.  In light of creating harmony, I will 
take that question out of the deck.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Stahura [mailto:stahura@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 5:35 PM
To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Neuman, Jeff; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Draft questions


Exactly.
If you make a policy under the premise that registrar's can't move, and
then it turns out they can, then you'd have inadvertently created forum
shopping opportunity. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 2:29 PM
To: Paul Stahura
Cc: Neuman, Jeff; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Draft questions

Paul Stahura wrote:

> We'll see how ICANN answers, but I can picture registrars, and even
> registries, moving either their place-of-incorporation or their
> "operations" for competitive reasons.

Which is why it doesn't make sense to create policies that encourage 
forum shopping.

Compliance with the RAA shouldn't be a point of competitive
differentiation.
-- 





                       -rwr



Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org