ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions

  • To: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:04:45 -0500

I think if you took out the word "if any" in the first question, that would 
help..l have also tried to reword the others to sound more objective.

1) What role does Whois play in supporting the Internet's security and 
stability?  

2) If there is such a role, what do you believe are the requirements of a Whois 
(or Whois-like system) to fulfill that role.

3) Would there be an impact to security and stability of the Internet if access 
to some or all Whois data were restricted.

Thoughts?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:29 AM
To: Marilyn Cade
Cc: 'Jordyn A. Buchanan'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions


I fail to understand why asking questions should be considered as
inquisitional. All we are doing is trying to find a solution 
to a problem. To do so asking questions to relevant bodies seems 
a very good approch to me and is exactly what we have been
doing over the last years. After all, no one would be disapointed
if the chair of the SSAC would have to take the questions back
to the SSAC to discuss it there fore giving us an answer.

Best,

tom

Am 23.03.2005 schrieb Marilyn Cade:
> I agree these questions were those that were put forward by Thomas and
> others on the call, however, I want to urge a neutral tone/approach to the
> SSAC. We are as a TF, supposed to be examining the issues and we don't want
> to come across as inquisitional. Our task is to be above our personal
> opinions and examine all view points and data points. We are "inviting" the
> SSAC Chair to dialogue with us. These questions, and others could provide
> the basis for that dialogue. 
> 
>  
> 
> Can we approach the SSAC with that ? some questions, we may have others,
> welcome your views as chair, understand that the issue of whether there is a
> later advisory opinion is open. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:40 PM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions
> 
>  
> 
> Bruce:
> 
>  
> 
> As we discussed yesterday, here are the questions that I propose we 
> 
> suggest that the SESAC chair address if he is available to brief the 
> 
> council/task force in Mar Del Plata:
> 
>  
> 
> 1) What role, if any, does Whois play in supporting the Internet's 
> 
> security and stability?
> 
>  
> 
> 2) What would be the security and stability impact of restricting 
> 
> access to some or all Whois data.
> 
>  
> 
> 3) What are the requirements of a Whois (or Whois-like system) to 
> 
> fulfill any security and stability role that the current Whois system 
> 
> may support.
> 
>  
> 
> Jordyn
> 
>  
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w  




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy