<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions
- From: Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:36:05 +0100
Jeff,
I guess I liked the old questions better. I don't think that "if any" is
presupposing anything.
Best,
tom
Am 24.03.2005 schrieb Neuman, Jeff:
> I think if you took out the word "if any" in the first question, that would
> help..l have also tried to reword the others to sound more objective.
>
> 1) What role does Whois play in supporting the Internet's security and
> stability?
>
> 2) If there is such a role, what do you believe are the requirements of a
> Whois (or Whois-like system) to fulfill that role.
>
> 3) Would there be an impact to security and stability of the Internet if
> access to some or all Whois data were restricted.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Thomas Keller
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:29 AM
> To: Marilyn Cade
> Cc: 'Jordyn A. Buchanan'; 'Bruce Tonkin'; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions
>
>
> I fail to understand why asking questions should be considered as
> inquisitional. All we are doing is trying to find a solution
> to a problem. To do so asking questions to relevant bodies seems
> a very good approch to me and is exactly what we have been
> doing over the last years. After all, no one would be disapointed
> if the chair of the SSAC would have to take the questions back
> to the SSAC to discuss it there fore giving us an answer.
>
> Best,
>
> tom
>
> Am 23.03.2005 schrieb Marilyn Cade:
> > I agree these questions were those that were put forward by Thomas and
> > others on the call, however, I want to urge a neutral tone/approach to the
> > SSAC. We are as a TF, supposed to be examining the issues and we don't want
> > to come across as inquisitional. Our task is to be above our personal
> > opinions and examine all view points and data points. We are "inviting" the
> > SSAC Chair to dialogue with us. These questions, and others could provide
> > the basis for that dialogue.
> >
> >
> >
> > Can we approach the SSAC with that ? some questions, we may have others,
> > welcome your views as chair, understand that the issue of whether there is a
> > later advisory opinion is open.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:40 PM
> > To: Bruce Tonkin
> > Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-dow123] Security/stability questions
> >
> >
> >
> > Bruce:
> >
> >
> >
> > As we discussed yesterday, here are the questions that I propose we
> >
> > suggest that the SESAC chair address if he is available to brief the
> >
> > council/task force in Mar Del Plata:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) What role, if any, does Whois play in supporting the Internet's
> >
> > security and stability?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) What would be the security and stability impact of restricting
> >
> > access to some or all Whois data.
> >
> >
> >
> > 3) What are the requirements of a Whois (or Whois-like system) to
> >
> > fulfill any security and stability role that the current Whois system
> >
> > may support.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jordyn
> >
> >
> >
>
> Gruss,
>
> tom
>
> (__)
> (OO)_____
> (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
> | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
> w w w w
>
>
Gruss,
tom
(__)
(OO)_____
(oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of
| |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger!
w w w w
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|