RE: [gnso-dow123] FW: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think that wording would be correct.

Thanks,
Tim



> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] FW:  Final Whois Task Force report on
> Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
> From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, May 28, 2005 4:03 pm
> To: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>,
> gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Jordyn, if you want to propose that language, which I agree is more accurate 
> description of the discussion, I am happy to support the chamge in the 
> language.
> 
> I would expect other TF members to be supportive since it is clarification.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 11:51:11 
> To:Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>, gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] FW:  Final Whois Task Force report on 
> Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
> 
> Tim:
> 
> I think this is just a parsing issue with the sentence, although in  
> retrospect it probably could have been more clear.  The intent is for  
> something that probably reads more like this:
> 
> "There was not universal agreement in the task force on the inclusion  
> of these issues, nor that all of these issues are worthy of further  
> consideration, and this list is not intended to be exhaustive".  I'll  
> be on the council call on Thursday and make this clear.
> 
> Jordyn
> 
> On May 28, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> 
> > All,
> >
> > Regarding the implementation issues document, it says in the opening
> > paragraph:
> >
> > "These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force, all
> > issues are worthy of further consideration and the list is not
> > exhaustive."
> >
> > That is not exactly how I recall it. The second phrase of this  
> > sentence
> > contradicts the first. I thought part of the disagreement over
> > including these issues was that not everyone believed they were worth
> > further consideration. I think either of the following two suggestions
> > more accurately captures what was agreed to:
> >
> > 1. These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force,  
> > and the
> > list is not exhaustive.
> >
> > OR
> >
> > 2. These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force and  
> > not
> > all agree that these issues are worthy of further consideration, and
> > the list is not exhaustive.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [gnso-dow123] FW:  Final Whois Task Force report on
> > Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
> > From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, May 26, 2005 2:52 pm
> > To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > FYI below is the message that went to the GNSO Council enclosing the
> > final task force report and the list of potential implementation
> > issues/questions.
> >
> > All the best, Maria
> >
> >   From: Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:42 PM
> > To: 'owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving
> > notification and consent
> >
> >
> >
> >  Dear all,
> >    Attached is the Final Task Force Report on recommendations for
> > improving notification and consent for the use of contact data in the
> > Whois system.  I am submitting this report to you on behalf of the
> > Combined WHOIS Task Force (1, 2, 3) of the GNSO Council.     The
> > Combined Whois Task Force has continued the work of Task Force 2 whose
> > terms of reference (29 October 2003) included the task of determining;
> > "What is the best way to inform registrants of what information about
> > themselves is made publicly available when they register a domain name
> > and ... and receive notification of its use?"    In addition, during
> > the combined task force's discussions, a number of implementation
> > issues were identified as possibly appropriate for consideration by an
> > implementation group, if the Council chooses to form such a group.  
> > This
> > list is attached with the caveats that the issues are not agreed on by
> > everyone in the task force, are all worthy of further consideration  
> > and
> > the list is not exhaustive.    Best regards, Maria
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Marilyn Cade