Re: [gnso-dow123] FW: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree also.

tom

Am 29.05.2005 schrieb Tim Ruiz:
> I think that wording would be correct.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] FW:  Final Whois Task Force report on
> > Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
> > From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, May 28, 2005 4:03 pm
> > To: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>,
> > gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Jordyn, if you want to propose that language, which I agree is more 
> > accurate description of the discussion, I am happy to support the chamge in 
> > the language.
> > 
> > I would expect other TF members to be supportive since it is clarification.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 11:51:11 
> > To:Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc:Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>, gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] FW:  Final Whois Task Force report on 
> > Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
> > 
> > Tim:
> > 
> > I think this is just a parsing issue with the sentence, although in  
> > retrospect it probably could have been more clear.  The intent is for  
> > something that probably reads more like this:
> > 
> > "There was not universal agreement in the task force on the inclusion  
> > of these issues, nor that all of these issues are worthy of further  
> > consideration, and this list is not intended to be exhaustive".  I'll  
> > be on the council call on Thursday and make this clear.
> > 
> > Jordyn
> > 
> > On May 28, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> > 
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Regarding the implementation issues document, it says in the opening
> > > paragraph:
> > >
> > > "These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force, all
> > > issues are worthy of further consideration and the list is not
> > > exhaustive."
> > >
> > > That is not exactly how I recall it. The second phrase of this  
> > > sentence
> > > contradicts the first. I thought part of the disagreement over
> > > including these issues was that not everyone believed they were worth
> > > further consideration. I think either of the following two suggestions
> > > more accurately captures what was agreed to:
> > >
> > > 1. These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force,  
> > > and the
> > > list is not exhaustive.
> > >
> > > OR
> > >
> > > 2. These issues are not agreed on by everyone in the task force and  
> > > not
> > > all agree that these issues are worthy of further consideration, and
> > > the list is not exhaustive.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: [gnso-dow123] FW:  Final Whois Task Force report on
> > > Recommendation 1 - improving notification and consent
> > > From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Thu, May 26, 2005 2:52 pm
> > > To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > FYI below is the message that went to the GNSO Council enclosing the
> > > final task force report and the list of potential implementation
> > > issues/questions.
> > >
> > > All the best, Maria
> > >
> > >   From: Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:42 PM
> > > To: 'owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > > Subject: Final Whois Task Force report on Recommendation 1 - improving
> > > notification and consent
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Dear all,
> > >    Attached is the Final Task Force Report on recommendations for
> > > improving notification and consent for the use of contact data in the
> > > Whois system.  I am submitting this report to you on behalf of the
> > > Combined WHOIS Task Force (1, 2, 3) of the GNSO Council.     The
> > > Combined Whois Task Force has continued the work of Task Force 2 whose
> > > terms of reference (29 October 2003) included the task of determining;
> > > "What is the best way to inform registrants of what information about
> > > themselves is made publicly available when they register a domain name
> > > and ... and receive notification of its use?"    In addition, during
> > > the combined task force's discussions, a number of implementation
> > > issues were identified as possibly appropriate for consideration by an
> > > implementation group, if the Council chooses to form such a group.  
> > > This
> > > list is attached with the caveats that the issues are not agreed on by
> > > everyone in the task force, are all worthy of further consideration  
> > > and
> > > the list is not exhaustive.    Best regards, Maria
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Marilyn Cade
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w