Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/08/2005 9:49 AM Fares, David noted that;
> Colleagues,
> 
>  
> 
> I remain somewhat confused by this discussion.  As noted by Bruce and as
> mentioned on the call yesterday, notice is already a requirement in the RAA.
> Moreover, "notice" is a general principle in every set of international
> guidelines and self-regulatory and legal/regulatory principles related to
> privacy.  With this in mind, is it not better that the notice be clear and
> conspicuous so that registrants fully understand the uses of the data that
> they submit as part of their registration?  
> 

David, if I may...

I believe we all agree of the intent of our recommendations, but there
is new disagreement regarding the effect of those recommendations. Until
and unless we can clarify the precise outcome of our proposal, we should
stick to the status quo. We can't be seen as making policy "just to see
how it works out."

This isn't an experiment and its my strong preference to err on the side
of caution until the impact of our proposal is better quantified.

- --
- --
Regards,



                       -rwr








                "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
                 every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
                 and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
                        - Robert Collier


Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFC+geb6sL06XjirooRAkGIAJ9Q9hb2W2Ktx8LQgMKTp8h5+5vXjQCeM/Ja
mEwwn2otB5vC3iiUTtEBTzo=
=lFFH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----