Re: [Fwd: Re: [gnso-dow123] Note to council on Notice recommendation]

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16/08/2005 11:57 AM Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie) noted that;
> I would say that any time an issue is raised after a final
> recommendation that attempts to reverse a task force proposal, without
> advance notice, without adequate opportunity for input by the
> constituencies, and legal opinions of individuals who are not on the
> task force and who did not comment on the recommendation are invoked as
> a basis for reversal, there is bound to be confusion.  So yes, I guess
> we can agree there is some confusion here.  

I don't think anyone is looking for a reversal of these recommendations
- - at least I'm not. I'm simply requesting, based on comments made by
members of your constituency and others, that the GNSO seek to
understand the implications of its actions prior to implementation.

I'm not sure if you have reviewed the recording or transcripts of our
call or not, but there is no hidden agenda here. I have questions and
I'm seeking answers. Until we have those answers, I don't think it's
responsible for us to proceed full steam ahead.
- --






                      -rwr



Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
Skydasher: A great way to start your day
My weblog: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFDAhG+6sL06XjirooRAkoEAJ9dPGZTDLkO69ro/QuUtJItqYydWACgiI8P
2lLOtPuGyvlM9f3oVpPCwag=
=eZTz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----