RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

["Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>]

Sorry folks.  I missed one, so I have slight a revision.  

 

I agree with Tom on #1 (leave it as is and open it for comment).
Disagree with change #2 since we have not yet taken up the tiered access
issue, and accept all remaining proposals.

 

Thanks,

Maggie

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:52 AM
To: Steve Metalitz; Jordyn A. Buchanan; Whois TF mailing list
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

 

Same here.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve Metalitz
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:09 AM
To: Jordyn A. Buchanan; Whois TF mailing list
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

 

I could support (or at least accept) all 7 of the changes, except #2.  

 

Steve Metalitz

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 5:23 PM
To: Whois TF mailing list
Subject: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

This change is from the ISPCP.  This change would add a new Step Six to
the guidance on the procedure.  The new section would read as follows: 

 

Step Six:  Ongoing Review

With substantial input from the relevant registries or registrars,
together with all constituencies, there should be a review of the pros
and cons of how the process worked, and the development of revisions
designed to make the process better and more efficient, should the need
arise again at some point in the future.[JAB1] 

________________________________

 [JAB1]