Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We should either a) clarify this substantially so that we have clearly
defined goals, metrics and timelines, or b) eliminate from the proposal.
The current language is not likely to generate sufficiently detailed
data that the community can act on.


On 30/08/2005 5:22 PM Jordyn A. Buchanan noted that;
> This change is from the ISPCP.  This change would add a new Step Six  to
> the guidance on the procedure.  The new section would read as  follows:
> 
> Step Six:  Ongoing Review
> 
> With substantial input from the relevant registries or registrars, 
> together with all constituencies, there should be a review of the  pros
> and cons of how the process worked, and the development of  revisions
> designed to make the process better and more efficient,  should the need
> arise again at some point in the future.
> 


- --
- --
Regards,



                       -rwr








                "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
                 every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
                 and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
                        - Robert Collier


Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFDFeKC6sL06XjirooRAlO2AJwIfq2AJOR7N0nBuAgJGXyshfneJACcCmNl
+jJwirpZlWiPtWP/BEXFyVs=
=eQ3Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----