Re: [gnso-dow123] Proposed change #7

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we should leave this to the council. They developed a standard
procedure to manage such reviews.

tom

Am 31.08.2005 schrieb Ross Rader:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> We should either a) clarify this substantially so that we have clearly
> defined goals, metrics and timelines, or b) eliminate from the proposal.
> The current language is not likely to generate sufficiently detailed
> data that the community can act on.
> 
> 
> On 30/08/2005 5:22 PM Jordyn A. Buchanan noted that;
> > This change is from the ISPCP.  This change would add a new Step Six  to
> > the guidance on the procedure.  The new section would read as  follows:
> > 
> > Step Six:  Ongoing Review
> > 
> > With substantial input from the relevant registries or registrars, 
> > together with all constituencies, there should be a review of the  pros
> > and cons of how the process worked, and the development of  revisions
> > designed to make the process better and more efficient,  should the need
> > arise again at some point in the future.
> > 
> 
> 
> - --
> - --
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                 "Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
>                  every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
>                  and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
>                         - Robert Collier
> 
> 
> Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
> My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
> 
> iD8DBQFDFeKC6sL06XjirooRAlO2AJwIfq2AJOR7N0nBuAgJGXyshfneJACcCmNl
> +jJwirpZlWiPtWP/BEXFyVs=
> =eQ3Z
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w