<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dow123] Public comments on preliminary task force report
- To: metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Public comments on preliminary task force report
- From: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:50:03 EDT
Steve and All:
I see several commenters who supported the policy and procedure as a good
first step, but requested that the GNSO take much stronger steps to protect
personal privacy. I think those comments could be fairly interpreted as not
seeking to dilute any of the provisions of the recommendation or procedures.
Regards, Kathy
> I did not see anything in the public comments that took an opposing
> position. Accordingly, on our call tomorrow, should we reconsider the
> rejection of proposals 3, 5, and 6? See
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-dow123/msg00554.html,
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-dow123/msg00556.html, and
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-dow123/msg00557.html.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|