RE: [gnso-dow123] Question 2 on tomorrow's call

["Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross posted:   

-
I said this on the last call, but apparently it bears repeating - the
definitions included in the transfers TF report were stated as advice to
the legal drafting team, i.e. the ICANN staff, to ensure that the intent
of the task force recommendations were appropriately implemented within
the various contracts. As was clearly identified early on in the
discussion regarding this PDP, these definitions are not suitable to
adopt as policy and should only be used as a starting point for the
discussions of this TF.

I don't believe that anyone, at any point, has claimed these definitions
as part of their position.

****

My copy of the Registry constituency statement on task 2 states:

"The RyC believes that the purpose of the various contacts are
adequately described in Exhibit C of the Transfers Task Force Report."

Steve