<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
- To: "Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
- From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:20:14 -0500
At 09:45 PM 12/8/2005 +0000, Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie) wrote:
Yes--common sense! More seriously, ISPs' have some of the largest
Internet abuse and complaint departments around and our repeated
sampling of complaint stats and data overwhelming bears this out.
Except that there wouldn't be much reason to complain to an abuse
department about someone unobtrusively using an anonymously
registered domain name for non-fraudulent purposes -- so you'd tend
to hear only about the negatives.
There's a Slashdot thread on the GAO report now:
<http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=170553&threshold=2&mode=nested&commentsort=0&op=Change>
. In a forum as likely to include enforcement zealots as privacy
activists, there are an awful lot of individuals saying they use
"false" information to protect their privacy and to avoid junk marketing.
--Wendy
-----Original Message-----
From: David W. Maher [mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie); KathrynKL@xxxxxxx;
kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
Do you have any factual basis for this assertion?
David Maher
At 11:24 AM 12/8/2005, Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie) wrote:
There are far more bad actors registering domains than there are
those falsifying information as a privacy concern.
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|