ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm

  • To: "Mansourkia, Magnolia \(Maggie\)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>, "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>, <KathrynKL@xxxxxxx>, <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
  • From: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:32:14 -0800

Bull.

You/they see more "bad actors" with false whois probably because
you/they are doing disproportionately more whois lookups for names that
bad actors registered.

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:45 PM
To: David W. Maher; KathrynKL@xxxxxxx; kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm

 

Yes--common sense! More seriously, ISPs' have some of the largest
Internet abuse and complaint departments around and our repeated
sampling of complaint stats and data overwhelming bears this out.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: David W. Maher [mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie); KathrynKL@xxxxxxx;
kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm

 

Do you have any factual basis for this assertion?
David Maher
At 11:24 AM 12/8/2005, Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie) wrote:

There are far more bad actors registering domains than there are those
falsifying information as a privacy concern.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy