RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...

[<ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Is your comment intended to mean that Staff have incorrectly or inappropriately 
summarized submissions made during the comment period?

Having read all of the comments made, and also the staff summary and analysis, 
I fail to understand the specific issue that the ISP/BC/IPC reps are raising. 
Perhaps a representative from this group could further clarify these confusing 
claims.

-ross

---
sent via Windows Mobile...hopefully.


-----Original Message-----
    From: "Marilyn Cade"<marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: 06/03/06 19:42:57
    To: "'Steve Metalitz'"<metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"KathrynKL@xxxxxxx"<KathrynKL@xxxxxxx>, "'GNSO 
Secretariat'"<gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"<gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: "'olof nordling'"<olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
    Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois 
and Whois con...
    
    I can support the need for more time, and also for staff to finalize the
    analysis/summary of all comments. That is the basic requirement. We don't'
    want to send a message that we disregard some comments and value others. by
    ignoring any comment, regardless of its content. 
    
     
    
    I am traveling next week, and will be on the West Coast. I can do a call at
    9:30 a.m. EST/6:30 a.m. my time in California on Tuesday or Wednesday.
    
     
    
    I've copied the senior policy staff as well, since we are discussing changes
    in timing and noting the importance of staff fulfilling the full analysis,
    summary of comments received.
    
     
    
    Marilyn Cade, BC representative to the TF.
    
     
    
     
    
      _____  
    
    From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
    Behalf Of Steve Metalitz
    Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 3:32 PM
    To: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx; GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and
    Whois con...
    
     
    
    I agree with Kathy's proposal and would associate myself with David and
    Tony's postings as well.  At a minimum another week would provide time for
    the staff to fairly and objectively summarize all the comments received,
    which has not been done in the draft sent just 24 hours before our scheduled
    call.  I also find the staff's dismissive characterization of many of  the
    comments opposing Formulation #1 entirely inappropriate.  If the report were
    to move forward in this form it would send the clear message that
    participation in the public comment process is a waste of time.  
    
     
    
    Steve Metalitz
    
      _____  
    
    From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
    Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
    Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:59 PM
    To: GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and
    Whois con...
    
    I would like to propose we move the meeting until next Wednesday.  I think
    the report deserves to be closely reviewed and the comments discussed.  With
    so many comments, and so much new text, we all need some time to do our
    work.
    
    With thanks to Maria and Glen for the report,
    Kathy