Here's what I think we should do.
I understand that the report was distributed rather late and that
there are some concerns. We are also overdue in getting this report
to Council.
We will postpone tomorrow's call until next Wednesday, March 15. On
that call, we will vote and the report will then be submitted to the
Council.
If you have concerns about the text contained in the current draft of
the final report, please submit proposed edits no later than the end
of the day on Wednesday, March 8. We can use the remaining time to
discuss and finalize the changes.
I believe this is a reasonable compromise and should help us move
ahead while addressing concerns about the current language in the
report.
Jordyn
On 3/6/06, Steve Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I agree with Kathy's proposal and would associate myself with David and
> Tony's postings as well. At a minimum another week would provide time for
> the staff to fairly and objectively summarize all the comments received,
> which has not been done in the draft sent just 24 hours before
our scheduled
> call. I also find the staff's dismissive characterization of many of the
> comments opposing Formulation #1 entirely inappropriate. If the
report were
> to move forward in this form it would send the clear message that
> participation in the public comment process is a waste of time.
>
> Steve Metalitz
> ________________________________
>
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:59 PM
> To: GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report
Purpose Whois and
> Whois con...
>
>
> I would like to propose we move the meeting until next Wednesday. I think
> the report deserves to be closely reviewed and the comments
discussed. With
> so many comments, and so much new text, we all need some time to do our
> work.
>
> With thanks to Maria and Glen for the report,
> Kathy
>