Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...

["Jordyn Buchanan" <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi David:

I think there is a Council call on Tuesday, and previoiusly Councilors
have requested not to have the TF meeting and the Council call on the
same days.

If I'm wrong in either assumption, I'm happy to schedule for Tuesday
the 14th instead.

Jordyn

On 3/6/06, David W. Maher <dmaher@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why Wednesday?
> This is maximum inconvenience. Tuesday at the usual time would be doable.
> David
>
>
> At 03:30 PM 3/6/2006, Jordyn Buchanan wrote:
> >Here's what I think we should do.
> >
> >I understand that the report was distributed rather late and that
> >there are some concerns.  We are also overdue in getting this report
> >to Council.
> >
> >We will postpone tomorrow's call until next Wednesday, March 15.  On
> >that call, we will vote and the report will then be submitted to the
> >Council.
> >
> >If you have concerns about the text contained in the current draft of
> >the final report, please submit proposed edits no later than the end
> >of the day on Wednesday, March 8.  We can use the remaining time to
> >discuss and finalize the changes.
> >
> >I believe this is a reasonable compromise and should help us move
> >ahead while addressing concerns about the current language in the
> >report.
> >
> >Jordyn
> >
> >On 3/6/06, Steve Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree with Kathy's proposal and would associate myself with David and
> > > Tony's postings as well.  At a minimum another week would provide time for
> > > the staff to fairly and objectively summarize all the comments received,
> > > which has not been done in the draft sent just 24 hours before
> > our scheduled
> > > call.  I also find the staff's dismissive characterization of many of  the
> > > comments opposing Formulation #1 entirely inappropriate.  If the
> > report were
> > > to move forward in this form it would send the clear message that
> > > participation in the public comment process is a waste of time.
> > >
> > > Steve Metalitz
> > >  ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:59 PM
> > > To: GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report
> > Purpose Whois and
> > > Whois con...
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to propose we move the meeting until next Wednesday.  I think
> > > the report deserves to be closely reviewed and the comments
> > discussed.  With
> > > so many comments, and so much new text, we all need some time to do our
> > > work.
> > >
> > > With thanks to Maria and Glen for the report,
> > > Kathy
> > >
>
>