Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I could not agree more. Lets move forward with the current report.

Best,

tom

Am 06.03.2006 schrieb Milton Mueller:
> The report doesn't really take very long to read. The only thing new in it is 
> the write up of the public comment period, which is four pages long, double 
> spaced. 
> 
> I would therefore favor moving ahead with our call on Tuesday. I see no need 
> to debate modification of the report. We all know how the battle lines are 
> drawn on this one. Within reasonable limits of accuracy and balance - and the 
> report is firmly within those reasonable limits - its words do not matter one 
> bit. We all know how we are going to vote on this. We all know how the 
> various constituencies in the broader community fall out on this. 
> 
> This task force's work is done. Let's conclude our role honorably and 
> expeditiously and move it on to the next stage. Let's show an understanding 
> of, a modicum of respect for, our limited role in the PDP. Let's not make the 
> wording of the report a proxy battle for the vote on a formulation of whois 
> purpose itself. Let's move on. 
> 
> Dr. Milton Mueller
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> http://www.digital-convergence.org
> http://www.internetgovernance.org
> 
> 
> >>> "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3/6/2006 3:32:12 PM >>>
> I agree with Kathy's proposal and would associate myself with David and
> Tony's postings as well.  At a minimum another week would provide time
> for the staff to fairly and objectively summarize all the comments
> received, which has not been done in the draft sent just 24 hours before
> our scheduled call.  I also find the staff's dismissive characterization
> of many of  the comments opposing Formulation #1 entirely inappropriate.
> If the report were to move forward in this form it would send the clear
> message that participation in the public comment process is a waste of
> time.  
>  
> Steve Metalitz
> ________________________________
> 
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] 
> On Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx 
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 12:59 PM
> To: GNSO Secretariat; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
> and Whois con...
> 
> 
> I would like to propose we move the meeting until next Wednesday.  I
> think the report deserves to be closely reviewed and the comments
> discussed.  With so many comments, and so much new text, we all need
> some time to do our work.
> 
> With thanks to Maria and Glen for the report,
> Kathy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w