ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates

  • To: <KathrynKL@xxxxxxx>, <jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates
  • From: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:14:16 -0500

The slide is factually correct and I believe should remain as Jordyn has
drafted it.  
 
Jordyn, aren't you going to miss this?????
 
Steve Metalitz 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 11:56 AM
To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Re: Updates


Thanks Jordyn for putting this together.  Hope everyone's travels to NZ
were uneventful.

Jordayn, I see these slides as a continuation of Vancouver, and
appreciate the updating you have done.  That said, I strongly object to
the line on Slide 8 (Status of Work).  "*Recently concluded public
comment period.  Received approximately 45 responses; most favored
Formulation #2"

I think this leave a very incomplete impression.  If we wanted to say
that "strong comments were submitted by both sides, with leading
organizations weighing in for both formulations."  that would be fine.  

Or if we wanted to take the following lines line from our Final Report,
that would be fine too:
       "The comments show a division in the community, with 9
respondents expressing support for Formulation 1 and 33 respondents
supporting Formulation 2.  A number of the comments supporting
Formulation 2 featured similar argumentation and structure which may be
the result of one or more constituencies encouraging participation and
responses during the public comment period."

It's a long sentence, but it is accurate and already agreed upon and
published. 
(and the issue is worthy of a little extra space and discussion).

Thanks, Kathy

<<



        Please find attached my first draft of the slides for the Public
Forum.
        
        I'm glad to make further edits, or if people in Wellington want
to
        co-ordinate any changes, that's fine as well.
        
        We should probably designate someone to give the presentation in
        Wellington.  Any volunteers?
        
        Jordyn
        
        On 3/23/06, Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        >Hello all:
        >
        >A few updates ahead of Wellington:
        >
        >1) I will be sending out a proposed set of slides momentarily.
        >Depending on how much time we've been allocated, these may be a
little
        >long and need to be edited down.  I'm glad to take comments and
        >continue to try to work on these on the next few days.
However, we
        >are going to need to designate someone from the Task Force to
present
        >the slides at the public forum, because...
        >
        >2) I will not be in Wellington.  I have recently decided to
leave
        >Register.com, and as a result will not be making the trip to
New
        >Zealand.  We will probably also need to discuss what this means
in
        >terms of the ongoing chairing of the task force.  I do want to
make
        >sure that we don't lose track of our work, though, so I'm more
than
        >willing to continue to help out as we figure out an ongoing
        >strategy...
        >
        >Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
        >
        >Jordyn
        >





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy