<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dow123] Move up time for call?
- To: "Maggie Mansourkia" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Move up time for call?
- From: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:18:00 -0400
I am in the same position as Maggie.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx>
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun Apr 16 19:39:06 2006
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Move up time for call?
I vote for Kathyâs option #2; Tuesday afternoon doesnât work for me.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 4:59 PM
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dow123] Move up time for call?
Jordyn and all:
As I mentioned in an earlier email, I am not available at the time of this
call. I have a very long-standing commitment that cannot be changed. Since
the NCUC procedural proposal is the first item on the agenda, I would very much
like to participate in its discussion.
Could we:
1) Move the call up to 1 PM EDT? or
2) Move the NCUC procedural proposal to the next meeting along with a
general discussion (one would expect) of next moves and further TORs to be
addressed?
Regards, Kathy
Agenda
1. discuss the NCUC procedural proposal,
2. recap events from Wellington,
3. discuss the future chairing of the task force.
<http://www.conferencemgr.com/Images/Default/spacer.gif> Date:
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
<http://www.conferencemgr.com/Images/Default/spacer.gif> Start Time: 02:30 PM
Eastern Daylight Time
<http://www.conferencemgr.com/Images/Default/spacer.gif> End Time: 03:55 PM
Eastern Daylight Time
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|