<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-dow123] Nomination for Co- Chairs for TF-follow up response
- To: <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-dow123] Nomination for Co- Chairs for TF-follow up response
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:43:15 -0400
Dear Ross and other colleagues
I too read the bylaws section, before making the nominations of co-chairs.
As I understand the Task Force's ability to elect its leadership, I see no
reason why co-chairs are not a positive outcome for the TF. As to anyone
making a "decision", I made a nomination.
However, since Ross has suggested that the TF needs a "ruling" from outside
the Task Force, to move the discussion along, I've cc'd Dan Halloran, deputy
general counsel, John Jeffrey, General Counsel, and Bruce Tonkin, chair,
GNSO. The Policy staff are of course routinely copied on the "list".
I note that I proposed "co-chairs", not two chairs. I believe that there is
a difference, just as there is a difference between a chair and a vice
chair. :-) I nominated two individuals from very different perspectives,
but with deep understanding of the work that has been done, and awareness of
the work that remains in order to ensure that there is strong trust in the
leadership process.
Regards, Marilyn Cade
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 3:32 AM
Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Nomination for Co- Chairs for TF
Marilyn Cade wrote:
> Is there a second to this nomination of co-chairs?
Who made the decision made to move from electing a chair to electing
co-chairs? With due respect to Steve and Kathryn, I don't believe that
this is a legitimate proposal.
The bylaws are clear in that they instruct the Task Force to select a
single chair - not two.
"c. Appointment of Task Force Chair. The Staff Manager shall convene the
first meeting of the task force within five (5) calendar days after
receipt of the Charter. At the initial meeting, the task force members
will, among other things, vote to appoint a task force chair. The chair
shall be responsible for organizing the activities of the task force,
including compiling the Task Force Report. The chair of a task force
need not be a member of the Council."
If it is the will of the task force to ignore the instructions of the
bylaws and pursue the election of two chairs, I would like to request
first that we seek instruction from our policy support staff, the GNSO
Council and ICANN's legal counsel regarding the legitimacy of such a
move. We must ensure the legitimacy of our processes so that we can
preserve the credibility of our output. I believe that this proposal
undermines our efforts and we should not proceed in this direction
without receiving further guidance.
If we are indeed electing two chairs, I will be nominating Paul Stahura
and Tom Keller. In the meantime, I don't believe that there is a
legitimate process in place to elect two chairs, therefore my nomination
of Avri stands.
If Kathryn and Steve wish to stand separately as individual candidates
for a sole chair, I would be happy to consider their candidacy.
--
-rr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
All life is an experiment.
The more experiments you make the better."
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Contact Info:
Ross Rader
Director, Research & Innovation
Tucows Inc.
c. 416.828.8783
Get Started? http://start.tucows.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|