RE: [gnso-dow123] Alternative proposal re Whois
http://www.icann.org/general/JPA-29sep06.pdf in #5 it says "icann shall continue to enforce existing policy relating to whois, such existing policy requires that icann implement measures to maintain timely, unrestricted and public access to accurate and complete whois information, including registrant, technical, billing and administrative contact information" I guess that rules out OPOC. By the way, billing contacts have not been require output since.... well... its been so long, I can't remember when (or even if they ever were required). Do we now need to change the registrar contracts to require billing contact information in the whois output? I mean you'd have to go back like 10 years (no kidding) to copy-past this language from some ancient internet document into this important ICANN-DoC agreement. Technically, I wonder if ICANN is already in breach.