Re: [gnso-dow123] Alternative proposal re Whois

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 30 sep 2006, at 10.40, Ross Rader wrote:

> Its quite clear that ICANN policy is made in DC, by ICANN staff, at  
> the request of the USG.


I tend to agree and must admit i am very much saddened at this turn  
of events.  I know some who support the laissez faire status quo  
whois standard will be quite pleased, but i think that the long term  
implications are quite threatening.

So, do we role up the TF with a quick one line report saying that  
that events have overcome the policy process?

a.