Re: [gnso-dow123] Changes to OPOC proposal: deletion instead of unmasking
- To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Changes to OPOC proposal: deletion instead of unmasking
- From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:18:26 -0400
I've made this alternate proposal for "correction" of data before,
but since we're sharing written suggestions for amendment, here's mine:
In lieu of having data corrected or revealed, registrant shall have
the option of allowing the domain name to lapse. Where the
registrant requests the "lapse" option, the domain name shall be
stopped from resolving and registrant's identifying information shall
not be turned over to the requesting party. Registrant may request
suspension pending resolution of the dispute in a "John Doe"
(anonymous) proceeding, or cancellation (where registrant does not
respond or challenge the request). In either case, registrant's
information shall not be turned over.
At 08:47 AM 9/25/2006 -0400, Avri Doria wrote:
- re Proposed 6, Under correcting Inaccurate Whois data
I still have problems with the phrase 'timely manner' and would be
comfortable with something like ' time manner but not less then 60
days' or some such measure.
- also Re Proposed Language 4: I want to reiterate how important I
think it is that the consumer be kept informed, and reminded, of the
purpose for which various data is kept and various data is
published. I also think it is important that there be a pointer back
to authoritative language on that purpose (ICANN theoretically can
provide the authoritative language) not matter what translation a
registrar may choose to provide for their customers.
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org