Re: [gnso-dow123] Agenda for Monday's call

["Jordyn Buchanan" <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ross:

Given the limited amount of time we have remaining before the publication of
the preliminary report, I'd still like to stick with the agenda to the
extent possible.  Obviously, Maria won't have time to incorporate Steve's
proposed edits into the report, so we'll have to discuss the structure a bit
more generally.

Also, I'd like to discuss some of the ideas that have been percolating
around the list (including my own) on item #3.

Jordyn

On 11/6/06, Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry, I meant to type "agenda items 1 *and* 3" not "agenda items 1 to
> 3". We should still try to move ahead with a discussion of agenda item
> #2, despite the uncertainty that Steve has thrown into the rest of the
> agenda.
>
> -ross
>
> Ross Rader wrote:
> > Are we still moving ahead with this agenda? Given the late hour at which
> > a final version of Steve's proposal was submitted, it occurs to me that
> > we might want to move agenda items 1 to 3 to our next call to give Maria
> > time to incorporate the latest iteration of Steve's document - I'd
> > personally prefer to avoid a discussion where we manually try to
> > reconcile the difference between the various versions that Steve has
> > tabled. Once these changes have been incorporated into the draft TF
> > report, I think we will be able to have a much clearer discussion of
> > Steve's ideas.
> >
> > Jordyn Buchanan wrote:
> >> Hi all:
> >>
> >> Here's a proposed agenda for Monday's call:
> >>
> >> 1) Discuss Maria's revised draft of the report (20 minutes)
> >> 2) Discuss access to non-published data (30 minutes)
> >> 3) Discuss other proposals (40 minutes)
> >>
> >> Jordyn
> >>
> >
> >