Re: [gnso-dow123] Agenda for Monday's call

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, I meant to type "agenda items 1 *and* 3" not "agenda items 1 to 
3". We should still try to move ahead with a discussion of agenda item 
#2, despite the uncertainty that Steve has thrown into the rest of the 
agenda.

-ross

Ross Rader wrote:
> Are we still moving ahead with this agenda? Given the late hour at which 
> a final version of Steve's proposal was submitted, it occurs to me that 
> we might want to move agenda items 1 to 3 to our next call to give Maria 
> time to incorporate the latest iteration of Steve's document - I'd 
> personally prefer to avoid a discussion where we manually try to 
> reconcile the difference between the various versions that Steve has 
> tabled. Once these changes have been incorporated into the draft TF 
> report, I think we will be able to have a much clearer discussion of 
> Steve's ideas.
>
> Jordyn Buchanan wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > Here's a proposed agenda for Monday's call:
> >
> > 1) Discuss Maria's revised draft of the report (20 minutes)
> > 2) Discuss access to non-published data (30 minutes)
> > 3) Discuss other proposals (40 minutes)
> >
> > Jordyn