<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dow123] FINAL REVIEW: Preliminary Task Force Report on Whois Services
- To: <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] FINAL REVIEW: Preliminary Task Force Report on Whois Services
- From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:43:06 -0500
Jordan, Maria:
I like Jordan's changes and am satisfied with publishing it that way.
Dr. Milton Mueller
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://www.digital-convergence.org
http://www.internetgovernance.org
>>> jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx 11/21/06 2:45 PM >>>
Sorry to make this process slightly more confusing, but I had some
problems
with the formatting of the voting section and wanted to fix it. As I
did
that, I came to the conclusion that the straw polls probably shouldn't
be
given the same "weight" as the official vote on publishing the report,
so
I've made the following changes:
1) Moved the results of the straw polls to footnotes in the sections
describing each of the policy recommendation that the poll applied to
(these
footnotes just provide some additional detail into something that is
already
reflected in the report: who supports the various proposals).
2) Changed the formatting of the voting table to have one cell per vote.
On
my system, the Xs didn't line up with each name, which left the chart
looking slightly strange. I think I've fixed that.
3) Added a statement in the voting section saying that we conducted the
straw polls and where to find the results, and that the call for
constituency statements will provide constituencies further opportunity
to
clarify their policy position.
I'll reset the 24 hour timer as of now. If we don't hear any
objections,
we'll publish the version I'm sending out now.
Jordyn
On 11/21/06, Jordyn Buchanan <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Maria:
>
> Is the voting chart for Accuracy right? I thought I had Ross and Avri
> abstaining, as opposed to voting no.
>
> Also, in looking at this I think it may not actually be right to put
the
> straw poll on the same footing as the "offical" vote on publishing the
> report. I'm going to send out something to the list that moves it
into a
> footnote in each of the relevant sections--but can you confirm the
Accuracy
> vote?
>
> Jordyn
>
> On 11/21/06, Maria Farrell < maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Attached is the Preliminary Task Force Report on Whois Services for
your
> > final review before it is posted for public comments.
> >
> > The task force has agreed to a final 24 hour period for comments.
This
> > time tomorrow - assuming no substantial comments have been received
- I will
> > send the report for posting on the ICANN website.
> >
> > As we are up against the US Thanksgiving holiday, can you please
have
> > your comments to me in advance of this time, tomorrow? It will be a
> > challenge to get the report published on our website, and if I have
the
> > report finalized by this time tomorrow it will help me to ensure
this
> > happens.
> >
> > Many thanks, Maria
> >
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|