<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] Re: [council] Draft Charter for new Whois Working Group
- To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Re: [council] Draft Charter for new Whois Working Group
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:45:38 -0700
I like to be a part of this WG as well.
Tim Ruiz
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-dow123] Re: [council] Draft Charter for new Whois
> Working Group
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, March 30, 2007 7:35 pm
> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Maria Farrell
> <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> Maria, thank you for creating the draft charter. I mostly favor it,
> but do have one issue. In fact it is, essentially, the same issue
> that caused me to vote against the creation of the WG of the first
> place.
>
> While the Background section of the report goes over the recent
> history of the Council vis a vis whois, it leaves out any mention of
> the decision made by the council in April of 2006 regarding the
> purpose of whois. While there may be a desire, or even an intention,
> to unwind this decision, I do not think we can do so by omission.
> Rather, if the council needs to reconsider in light of intervening
> events as was indicated when the decision was first made, they we
> should should do so openly and transparently. Personally I would
> prefer to not have to reconsider the purpose of whois, but if we do,
> we should do so intentionally and it may make sense to do in terms of
> the requirements (whatever the final set may be) that the WG has to
> deal with.
>
> I also welcome the notion of working within a GNSO Council WG that
> includes, as full members, members of the GAC, representatives from
> government agencies (e.g. law enforcement) and the broader community.
> Am I correct in assuming that we would also welcome, and invite,
> members from other ICANN ACs as well as members from government
> agencies such as those involved in privacy protection, freedom of
> expression and data protection?
>
> In any case, I would like to be included in this Working Group and
> look forward to working within a multistakeholder group to achieve a
> greater consensus with the council and the community.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 30 mar 2007, at 14.51, Maria Farrell wrote:
>
> > Dear Council members,
> >
> > Attached is the draft Charter that sets out the statement of work
> > and working methodologies of the Whois Working Group, created by
> > resolution of the GNSO Council in Lisbon, on 28 March.
> >
> > Please review it and note that it will be an agenda item for
> > discussion and adoption at the next Council meeting on 12 April.
> >
> > Also, please email this list if you wish to be on the Working
> > Group, and feel free to to put any interested constituency members
> > or outside experts in touch with me for further information.
> >
> > All the best, Maria
> > <Whois Working Group Charter2.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|