RE: [gnso-dt-wg] DT Outcomes Report - new draft, 1.3

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff, I don't agree with your suggested changes.

1.2 The responses were a fair cross-section in my opinion. In fact,
registrants, non-commercial, and individual internet users outnumber the
IP respondents. The registry and registrar count may seem low but are
not when considering the population of each category.

The comment in the report regarding ccTLDs' AGP is based on the actual
responses received from the ccTLDs. I believe it is accurate as written.

4.1 The report is not declaring Mark Monitor's and CADNA reports as
statistical and factual. It is simply saying that some respondents
listed them in response to that question, which is absolutely true.

Regarding the eight responses submitted through the email list, no such
assertion of fact is being made. It simply says the responses were
included in the overview of the Big Pulse results. So you may not agree
with the contents of those responses, but it would be inappropriate to
characterize them any differently than the other results. Since I
submitted one of those responses I object to any attempt to have this
report cast dispersions on any of the responses that people have gone
through the time and trouble to submit, whether I agree with them or
not.


Tim 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] DT Outcomes Report - new draft, 1.3
From: "Jeffrey Eckhaus" <jeckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, September 26, 2007 8:28 am
To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>,  <gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx>

Here are my comments in the document. There are only a few

Thanks

Jeff



-----Original Message-----
From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 4:44 AM
To: Jeffrey Eckhaus; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] DT Outcomes Report - new draft, 1.3

Jeff,
Redline version (for many small changes) or text in a mail or annex (for
longer single pieces) or any other method you may think of - your
choice,
really. Thanks for asking!
Best regards
Olof

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Eckhaus
Sent: den 26 september 2007 02:53
To: Olof Nordling; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] DT Outcomes Report - new draft, 1.3


Olof,

What is the preferred method for sending comments? 

Thanks

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:02 AM
To: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dt-wg] DT Outcomes Report - new draft, 1.3

Dear all,
Attached please find a new version of the report for your review and
comments.
Changes in this one are:
- Mike's comments incorporated
- comments included in Annex 2 for 8 RFI email responses 
- BigPulse overview updated with manually entered ballots for the same
- corresponding figures updated in section 4.1
- some typos rectified
Wishing you happy reading!
Olof