RE: [gnso-dt-wg] RE: Domain Tasting - Outcomes Report version 1.4

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't agree with this charactization. I think 4.3 can be left as is.
It is simply the results of a data gathering excercise to show how
registrars use the AGP for things other than tasting. I don't see any
good reason not to include it in the body of the report with perhaps a
explanatory opening paragraph as to how the information was collected.
This is not a PDP. It is an informational excercise for the Council to
use in deciding whether a PDP is warranted. I think Council will
understand how to frame section 4.3 in their deliberations.


Tim 


From: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Date: Sat, Sep 29, 2007 5:00 pm 
To: "Kristina Rosette" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx,
"Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx 

I agree with Kristina. The "conclusion document from the RC" written as
is is more appropriate as an annex.... With a simple sentence of
reference in the body of the report.

Nothing aginst a piece like this written by a constituency, but is not
equivalent to a transparent poll. It can probably be fixed with a list
of the number of respondents/the list of questions asked/etc, on the
other hand if it was conducted more like a qualitative 'call out' which
is still interesting, but not the same as an open survey, just describe
the chacteristics of how the responses were gathered, and include as a.
Annex. 
Regards,
Marilyn Cade