Re: [gnso-et] Affiliation issue

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Caroline Greer wrote:

> An issue coming up in our Registry discussion around RT candidates –
> 
> It seems that there is some ambiguity as regards affiliation within the 
> applications – some people, in answering the GNSO question ‘are you 
> representing any other entity?’ could be seen, in saying ‘no etc etc’, to be 
> (1) simply stating that they will represent the GNSO as a whole and not a 
> particular SG (as is proper) or (2) stating their desire to be unaffiliated.
> 
> 
That was Kristina's language, I thought it was legal speak about representing a 
client, so neither of your two choices
> Case in point is Mark Bohannon who, FYI, the RySg is considering as a member 
> of the Commercial Stakeholder Group
> 
> 
I thought he was too

this is a publicly archived list?  do we want to talk about candidates here?

I have a pressing question about the categorization of another, will go offlist