RE: [gnso-et] Affiliation issue

["Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>]

So, that's a third ambiguity! 
 
I am not sure about archives but in any case, we are just clarifying
affiliations which should be obvious to all, as well as our
understanding of the rules.
 
Happy to go 'off list' though for any sensitive issues.
 
Thanks.
 
Caroline.
 
From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 09 March 2010 13:36
To: Caroline Greer
Cc: Gnso-et@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-et] Affiliation issue
 
 
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Caroline Greer wrote:



An issue coming up in our Registry discussion around RT candidates - 
It seems that there is some ambiguity as regards affiliation within the
applications - some people, in answering the GNSO question 'are you
representing any other entity?' could be seen, in saying 'no etc etc',
to be (1) simply stating that they will represent the GNSO as a whole
and not a particular SG (as is proper) or (2) stating their desire to be
unaffiliated.
 
That was Kristina's language, I thought it was legal speak about
representing a client, so neither of your two choices


Case in point is Mark Bohannon who, FYI, the RySg is considering as a
member of the Commercial Stakeholder Group
 
I thought he was too
 
this is a publicly archived list?  do we want to talk about candidates
here?
 
I have a pressing question about the categorization of another, will go
offlist