<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Updated version - FF recommended next steps
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, Fast Flux Workgroup <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Updated version - FF recommended next steps
- From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:45:05 -0700
I'm having trouble understanding the recommendations section.
In the 1st paragraph, the report says
" the Working Group does recommend that the GNSO Council explore other means
to address fast flux hosting instead of a policy development process"
Later, it says
"Explore the possibility to involve other stakeholders in the fast flux
policy development process"
Perhaps I'm dense, but these seem contradictory.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|