[gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Back to work...

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

Thanks for all the help yesterday.  Sorry I've been so slow in 
posting the follow-up emails.  Right after the call I deleted the 
file I was taking notes in, so I have to run through the MP3 and 
recreate it.  I'll do it, but today's a picture-perfect day here at 
the farm, so I'm taking the day off.
Meanwhile, a picture came into my head this morning over coffee and I 
thought I'd share it with you.  Here's a link;
https://st.icann.org/pdp-wg-ff/index.cgi?mikes_infoenginev1

I love giving things lame names, 'cause I know that way the name 
won't last long.
Observations;

- This is purely optional for all parties.  ISPs *can* add a 
"Verifier" box to their rack if they want.  Registrars/Registries 
wouldn't have to change anything.
- The cycle of delivering a DNS response to an end user would remain 
speedy/scaleable
- The ISPs existing DNS server would be untouched (it just wouldn't 
get quite as many requests)
- The "Researcher" could go anywhere and could be as thick and slow 
as needed to determine the "fluxiness" of an address
Off to kill living things with chainsaws and mowers.  I'll get those 
follow-up items out there tomorrow.
m


voice: 651-647-6109
fax: 866-280-2356

web: www.haven2.com