<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Cost of attacks (and proportion attributable to Fast Flux)
- To: "fast Flux Workgroup" <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Cost of attacks (and proportion attributable to Fast Flux)
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:28:37 -0500
And now, for something completely different...
As the final buffing continues on the definition, how about some new topics?
Following up on a comment in the last phone call, here's a 2007
Gartner press release that puts the estimated losses from phishing
attacks at $3.2 billion;
http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=565125
Questions;
-- Are there other cost numbers that we could use to express the
financial size of the *overall* problem? (Dave pointed out that it's
not just phishing, and it's not just outright financial losses that
we should include, so let's expand on this a bit)
-- Given our definition, is there data can we use to assign a
proportion of the overall problem to Fast Flux? (That seems to be a
path towards apportioning "harm")
-- Is there a way to project the trend in that "proportion" data?
Have at it,
m
voice: 651-647-6109
fax: 866-280-2356
web: www.haven2.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|