Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Proposed solutions

[Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>]

Can we agree at the outset of this discussion that there is no single security 
measure that defeats fast flux and that the solution, like the definition, is 
multi-faceted, each measure contributing in some way to reducing the threat?

I'll be frank. I want to preempt another long discussion of TTLs. I am happy to 
include a bullet item "TTL monitoring and analysis" as item 1 on the list but 
let's go through the discipline of enumerating all the measures we can think 
of, as we did with the definition.


On 7/31/08 12:35 PM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Seems as though we've got a pretty good handle on the definition.

How about opening up the floodgates on a discussion of proposed solutions?

We have a few proposals.  Are there others?  I know that I've sortof
damped this part of the conversation down a bit, while we were
hammering out the definition.  Now's the time to present alternatives.

m


voice: 651-647-6109
fax: 866-280-2356

web: www.haven2.com