Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Proposed solutions

[RLVaughn <RL_Vaughn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dave Piscitello wrote:
> Can we agree at the outset of this discussion that there is no single security 
> measure that defeats fast flux and that the solution, like the definition, is 
> multi-faceted, each measure contributing in some way to reducing the threat?
How about solutions between the two strategies of:
     1)  dismantling the Internet - which removes all Internet-based threats
         with probability 1;
     2)  Doing nothing - which removes all Internet-based threats with
         probability 0
?

The point of the jest being having a handle on the efficacy for
suggested interventions might be of use.

> I'll be frank. I want to preempt another long discussion of TTLs. I am happy to include a 
> bullet item "TTL monitoring and analysis" as item 1 on the list but let's go 
> through the discipline of enumerating all the measures we can think of, as we did with 
> the definition.

> On 7/31/08 12:35 PM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems as though we've got a pretty good handle on the definition.
>
> How about opening up the floodgates on a discussion of proposed solutions?
>
> We have a few proposals.  Are there others?  I know that I've sortof
> damped this part of the conversation down a bit, while we were
> hammering out the definition.  Now's the time to present alternatives.
>
> m
>
>
> voice: 651-647-6109
> fax: 866-280-2356
>
> web: www.haven2.com